
WMT vs COST
$WMT vs $COST head to head: price, market cap, valuation, dividend, free float, relative volume and how actively each trades. The bigger value in the size rows is bolded. Tap either ticker for its live chart, full ownership breakdown and real-time alerts.
WMT vs COST: the quick read
- ·WMT is the larger company by market cap ($846.77B vs $397.05B).
- ·WMT has been more active on our scanner (64 vs 35 alerts in 30 days).
- ·COST has the smaller float (443.0M vs 4.40B), which tends to mean sharper, more volatile moves.
- ·WMT trades at the lower P/E (17.7 vs 61.0).
- ·Both are retail-variety stores names, so this is a like-for-like comparison and sector news tends to move them together.
- ·WMT trades at a small fraction of the other's share price, so position sizing and the size of a "normal" move differ a lot between them.
- ·Both stay busy on our scanner, 64 and 35 unusual-volume alerts over 30 days, so neither is the quiet one here.
- ·Both sit in the bottom quarter of their 52-week range, so this is a comparison of two names well off their highs.
- ·Both pay a dividend, so this is one of the few pairs here where yield is a fair tiebreaker.
- ·COST is the one in play today, trading about 2.2x its normal volume, which is what puts a name on our scanner in the first place.
Objective differences only. Not investment advice.
Get the best catches in your inbox
Free daily email of the top plays and unusual-volume alerts our scanner flags. No account needed.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Not investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know comparing WMT and COST on TheDesperateTrader.
- Is WMT or COST the better stock?
- "Better" depends on your goal, and these two are not alike. WMT is the larger company by market cap ($846.77B vs $397.05B). WMT has been more active on our scanner (64 vs 35 alerts in 30 days). COST has the smaller float (443.0M vs 4.40B), which tends to mean sharper, more volatile moves. Those are the measured differences, not a recommendation, and nothing here is investment advice.
- What is the difference between WMT and COST?
- The differences that matter: they are similar in size ($846.77B vs $397.05B); they trade at very different share prices ($106.82 vs $896.70); WMT sits at 22% of its 52-week range against 21% for COST; our scanner flagged WMT 64 times in the last 30 days against 35 for COST. Everything above is measured from the latest completed session and SEC filings.
- Which of WMT and COST is more active right now?
- Right now WMT is at about 1.8x its normal volume and COST is at about 2.2x, so COST is the one drawing unusual attention today. Relative volume (RVOL) compares a stock's volume to its own recent average, so it reads the same way for a megacap and a microcap and is the quickest way to tell which of two similar names is actually in play.
- Is this comparison data live?
- Prices and % changes are anchored to the latest completed session and split-adjusted, so a reverse split never shows as a fake move. Float is estimated from SEC filings and refreshed as new filings publish.
Trading WMT or COST? Get real-time unusual-volume alerts the moment either one moves, free.
No card · 5 premium daysMore WMT and COST comparisons
Same sector, similar size. These are the peers each one is usually weighed against.
Explore the market
Free, live market tools. No account required to look.